But I digress. It is easy to become sidetracked on this subject when recalling the incredible hypocrisy that surfaced in Duke's attempts to rationalize.
The point here is that Gerald Henderson has already received barrels of well-deserved ink as a result of his goonish play. His was the most frightening flagrant foul that I have seen in thirty years of following college basketball. The contact and its aftermath were reminiscent of Kermit Washington's brutal punching of Rudy Tomjanovich. If Vitale means to suggest that additional negative press is due this "Super Soph," I wholeheartedly agree. But, somehow, the analyst argues the contrary: that Henderson merits more in the way of favorable publicity. Is Vitale's memory this short or his love for Duke this blind?
Boozer initially said he worked as a programmer and made $125,000 per year. But when told former co-workers said he was an administrative assistant, Boozer recanted, saying he earned about $40,000 annually doing administrative work.
